Popular now
Poundstretcher receives High Court approval for restructuring plan

Poundstretcher receives High Court approval for restructuring plan

Frasers Group launches all cash takeover bid for Accent Group

Frasers Group launches all cash takeover bid for Accent Group

The Cotswold Company FY sales rise 23% to ‘record’ £123m

The Cotswold Company FY sales rise 23% to ‘record’ £123m

Pure Collection fined nearly $1m for customs evasion

Pure Collection fined nearly $1m for customs evasion

On this episode of Talking Shop we are joined by Phil James, founder and Creative Director of the contemporary heritage clothing brand &SONS. Phil began his career behind the lens as a commercial advertising photographer, working with global brands to hone a distinct visual language. But in 2016, he decided to step out from behind the camera to build a brand of his own.

Register to get free articles

No spam Unsubscribe anytime

Want unlimited access? View Plans

Already have an account? Sign in

Clothing retailer Pure Collection has been fined $908,100 (£655,230) by the US government to settle a whistleblower lawsuit for customs evasion.

Andrew Patrick, the whistleblower who exposed the alleged fraud, worked for Pure Collection from 2010 to 2014.

Patrick alleged in his lawsuit that Pure Collection engaged in a practice known as ‘splitting’, in which the company trained its employees to divide individual US orders into multiple shipping packages so that the retail value of the merchandise in each package would not trigger customs duties.

He added: “By splitting packages, Pure Collection deprived the US of legitimate payments. This effectively decreased the true price of its merchandise for US residents, giving the company an unfair advantage over its competitors.”

Molly Knobler, a whistleblower attorney at law firm Phillips & Cohen, which brought the case said: “One of the company’s marketing pitches to US customers was a promise that they wouldn’t have to pay customs duties on the merchandise they bought from Pure Collection online.

“It was successful as a marketing strategy, but wrong as a company practice.”

Previous Post
Primark fined £47,000 over transgender discrimination ruling

Primark fined £47,000 over transgender discrimination ruling

Next Post
Asda under fire for ‘sexist t-shirt’

Asda under fire for ‘sexist t-shirt’