Popular now
Debenhams sublets US warehouse to cut costs

Debenhams sublets US warehouse to cut costs

Virgin Wines downgrades profit forecast as inflation hits margins

Virgin Wines downgrades profit forecast as inflation hits margins

Whole Foods Market opens new grocery store in St James

Whole Foods Market opens new grocery store in St James

Game reprimanded by ASA for ‘misleading’ advert

Game reprimanded by ASA for ‘misleading’ advert

On this episode of Talking Shop we are joined by Phil James, founder and Creative Director of the contemporary heritage clothing brand &SONS. Phil began his career behind the lens as a commercial advertising photographer, working with global brands to hone a distinct visual language. But in 2016, he decided to step out from behind the camera to build a brand of his own.

Register to get free articles

No spam Unsubscribe anytime

Want unlimited access? View Plans

Already have an account? Sign in

Game has been reprimanded by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) after a complainant claimed an advert suggested the company only accepted trade-ins depending on the age of a game.

The advert showed a man handing down a game to his son whilst telling him the history behind his ownership of it, upon receiving the game the son takes it to a Game store and asks an employee, “Can I trade this please?”, with the employee replying, “Sure”. The complainant added they “thought PC games were excluded” from the offer.

Clearcast, the makers of the ad, said they were very clear to not reference any particular game, format or generation. The company said the purpose of the advert was to “make light and bring humour to what was basically a boring transactional function”. Clearcast said: “PC game exclusion was not a known condition at script stage”.

When contacted by the ASA, Game confirmed its trade-in offer excluded PC games and said that they classed games from “two console generations ago or more” as “retro” and also did not accept these as part of the offer.

Despite the ASA deciding that “consumers were unlikely to regard [the advert] as realistic or illustrative of any particular game or type of game that Game would accept for trade in”. The regulatory body said “the fact there were restrictions on the types of products that Game would accept for trade-in” meant the advert was “misleading”.

The ASA said: “The ad must not appear again in the form complained about. We told Game Retail Ltd to ensure they made significant conditions and limitations clear in their advertising, including the exclusion of certain types of products from the trade-in offer.”

Previous Post
The escalating issue of ‘serial returners’

The escalating issue of ‘serial returners’

Next Post
More than 75% of retail payments now made by card

More than 75% of retail payments now made by card